2020 CALL FOR PROPOSALS
CALL FOR PROPOSALS
The Open Education Conference is inviting proposals for synchronous and asynchronous virtual sessions. The conference will be held online November 9-13, 2020, and proposals are enthusiastically welcomed from anyone, anywhere with an interest in sharing about open education.
The Open Education Conference (#OpenEd20) is an annual convening for sharing and learning about open educational resources, open pedagogy, and open education initiatives. Designed through a collaborative process that leverages the passion and expertise of the community, #OpenEd20 aims to engage diverse perspectives, facilitate connections that drive effective practice, and inspire participants to strive for a future where education is accessible, affordable, equitable, and inclusive for all.
This document outlines the conference theme, topics, session types, and guidelines.
The 2020 Call for Proposals is closed.
Theme
“Reimagining Open Education”
The theme of the 2020 Open Education Conference is “Reimagining Open Education.” This theme reflects how the events of 2020 have underscored urgent challenges in education—both new and longstanding—from the rapid pivot online in response to a global pandemic, structural inequities including systemic racism, and barriers to the access and full participation in the exchange of knowledge.
This year’s conference seeks to inspire attendees to “reimagine” open education as a solution to these many challenges, and also to think critically about how the current practice of open education can be more equitable and inclusive. The theme also applies to the conference itself, which is in the process of "revising" and "remixing" itself as a community-owned event as it enters its seventeenth year.
Reimagining must be an active process. It starts with critical reflection and the formulation of ideas, but it is only meaningful if concrete action follows. In choosing the theme of reimagining, our intent is to spark active efforts to reinvigorate, reinvent, and reshape open education for a more equitable future.
Topics
The conference program will focus on a set of eight topics derived from data on what community members most want to learn at the conference. The topics are intended to apply across various contexts, stakeholders, and practices, spanning higher education, K-12, and international collaboration.
Open Education 101: The Basics and How to Get Started
Applications of Open Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Creative, Innovative, and Effective Open Education Practices
What Isn’t Working: Barriers, Challenges, and How to Overcome Them
Strategies, Policies, and Best Practices for Sustainable Open Education Efforts
Applications of Open Education in Social Justice, Inclusion, and Anti-Racism
Exploring Intersections and Collaborations Across Borders and Contexts
The Evolution and Study of Open Education as a Field
Each session should select the topic that best applies. In the spirit of “reimagining,” there is also an option to propose sessions that do not fall clearly into one of these topics, so long as there is a connection to the broader conference theme. The conference program will also utilize tags to make it easier to search for sessions of interest to specific sectors, regions, stakeholders, or disciplines.
Session Types
The conference will be conducted entirely as a virtual event. Synchronous sessions will be held live at a specific time in the program. Asynchronous types will be submitted in advance and available to browse “on demand” throughout the event.
Presentation
Synchronous • 25 min
Presentations are standalone talks that focus on a single topic, project, program, or study. This type of session will be scheduled in concurrent slots and comprise the majority of the program. Sessions may be either presented live or pre-recorded with live Q&A. A maximum of three speakers is allowed, and 5 of the 25 minutes should be reserved for audience Q&A.
Panel
Synchronous • 55 min
Panels are structured discussions between multiple speakers offering diverse perspectives or approaches on a common theme. Panels should include three or four speakers, inclusive of a moderator if desired. Proposals should outline the topic of the panel along with how each panelist will contribute a different perspective to foster an engaging and informative conversation. At least 10 minutes should be reserved for audience Q&A.
Interactive Discussion
Synchronous • 55 min
Interactive discussions are facilitated sessions intended to engage the audience in exploring a topic. These may begin with a brief presentation (maximum 10 minutes) to frame the session, then devote the majority of the time to participant interaction. Proposals should address what interactive tools or techniques will be used, which may include virtual breakout rooms (available for all discussions), live polling, or other options.
Workshop
Synchronous • 55 or 110 min
Workshops will engage participants in practical activities focused on learning new skills, trying out tools or techniques, or collaborating on a project. Proposals should clearly specify what participants will learn, do, or make, and also what tools or techniques will be used to support collaboration. Virtual breakout rooms are available for all workshops, and sessions may either be 55 minutes or 110 minutes.
Lightning Talk
Asynchronous • 10 min
Lightning talks are short pre-recorded videos that offer a quick take on a story, case study, idea, or technique. Authors are welcome to interpret this format traditionally or creatively, and may either record a talk or edit together a video. If accepted, presenters will be required to submit the video prior to the conference. Videos should be openly licensed and approximately 10 minutes in length.
Showcase Gallery
Asynchronous • Multi-format
This category includes asynchronous, openly licensed content in any format, including video, audio, blog posts, surveys, reports, papers, posters, infographics, resources, etc. The content does not need to be created specifically for the conference, but proposals should clearly address how the content relates to the conference topics or theme. If accepted, presenters will be required to submit the proposed content prior to the conference along with a featured image. The Showcase Gallery will be available to browse throughout the event.
Submission Process (Closed)
Proposals are enthusiastically welcomed from anyone with an interest in sharing about open education, including all countries, educational contexts, professional roles, and especially including students and diverse perspectives.
Proposals can be submitted through the Cvent platform. Note that primary authors are required to create an account in order to submit. For convenience, we have published a reusable template with all of the instructions and form fields.
Timeline
September 1 - Submission Deadline
September 30 - Decisions
October 9 - Schedule Published
October 26 - Asynchronous Content Deadline
November 9-13 - Conference
Submission Policies
Submissions have strict character limits intended to encourage succinct and engaging descriptions. This includes a session abstract of no more than 2,500 characters (~300 words).
Each individual may be listed as a presenter/author on up to 3 proposals total, with a limit to being the lead author on up to 1 synchronous proposal and up to 1 asynchronous proposal.
It is a general expectation that all presentation materials (slides, papers, asynchronous content) will be openly licensed. In cases where presentation materials may not be openly licensed, submissions should offer a brief explanation.
Accepted authors will be required to agree to a speaker release and the conference code of conduct. Accepted primary authors are expected to register for the conference, but may request a waiver at the time of acceptance.
Accepted primary authors for synchronous sessions are required to attend a 1-hour training session to prepare for presenting at the conference.
The conference will correspond with the person listed as the primary author. It is the primary author's responsibility to manage any requirements of the session and coordinate with any co-authors.
Review Process
The proposal review process will be conducted entirely by community members. The first round of reviews will be conducted by Proposal Reviewers, who signed up in an open call for volunteers. Members of the OpenEd Program Team (listed below) will then review the results and make final decisions based on the available time slots. Participate in the OpenEd planning process.
Selection Criteria
Relevance of Topic: Relation to the use, practice, creation, evaluation, research, or critique of open education (or drawing a connection between open education and a related space) and alignment with the conference theme and/or topic(s).
Value to Attendees: Concrete learning outcomes or key takeaways that will meaningfully contribute to attendees’ understanding of open education and that are consistent with the session described.*
Quality of Proposal: Clear, coherent written description that communicates to prospective attendees what the session will cover in alignment with the submission requirements.
Diversity: Extra consideration will be given to proposals that offer especially strong evidence of contributing diverse programming and/or supporting diverse voices.
Significance: Extra consideration will be given to proposals that offer an especially strong, innovative, and/or timely alignment with the conference theme and topics.
* Proposals that discuss the use of a proprietary product or service must have learning outcomes that are applicable outside the context of that product or service.
Decisions & Scheduling
Decisions will be delivered by email to the lead author around September 30, 2020. In most cases, proposals will be accepted or declined as written. In some cases, proposals will be accepted as a different session type or on the condition of revisions.
In welcoming broad international participation, the conference wishes to be transparent that synchronous programming will be scheduled primarily according to North American business hours. Accepted proposals with large time differentials will receive priority in the scheduling process. We are committed to being as flexible as possible.
Attribution
This work by Open Education Conference is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Numerous individuals participated in developing this Call for Proposals. The process began with input on what community members most wanted to learn and share at the conference gathered during the June 26, 2020 Conference Community Meeting (facilitated by Steering Committee members Emily Ragan and Tiffani Reardon, with data analysis performed by Kathy DesRoches). Members of the Program Team (listed below) engaged in numerous working sessions over four weeks to distill the data into topics, session types, policies for the CFP, and ultimately this document. The document was also shared with each of the other four Planning Teams for review of relevant sections.
The theme of “Reimagining Open Education” was developed by members of the conference Steering Committee based on feedback in support of a broad and aspirational theme.
Program Team Members
Amanda Larson, Affordable Learning Instructional Consultant, The Ohio State University
Amy E. Harris Tan (Steering Committee), Dean, English and Communications, Houston Community College
Brenda Smith, Open Education Librarian, Thompson Rivers University
Emily Ragan (Steering Committee), Associate Professor, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Metropolitan State University of Denver
Jonathan Poritz, Associate Professor of Math and Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning, Colorado State University Pueblo
Karen Pikula, OER Faculty Development Coordinator for Minnesota State / Psychology Faculty , Minnesota State, Central Lakes College, Minnesota West
Kelly Gillerlain, Professor of Business, Tidewater Community College
Krista Higham, Access Services Librarian, Millersville University
Matt Ruen, Scholarly Communications Outreach Coordinator, Grand Valley State University
Mo Nyamweya (Conference Team), Open Education Coordinator, SPARC
Moustapha Diack, Professor, Doctoral Program in Sciences/Math Education (SMED), College of Sciences & Engineering (CSE), Southern University in Baton Rouge (SUBR)
Muhammad Rahman, Professor of Computer Science, Clayton State University
R. Ann O'Connor, Associate Professor of Communication, Ivy Tech Community College - Indianapolis
Robert Awkward, Assistant Commissioner for Academic Effectiveness, Mass. Department of Higher Education
Sarah Hammershaimb, Teacher Librarian, Cherry Creek School District
Stacy Katz, Open Resources Librarian, Lehman College, CUNY
Tiffani Reardon (Steering Committee), Program Manager, Affordable Learning Georgia, University System of Georgia
The conference team would like to acknowledge the organizers of OER20, from which we drew inspiration and best practices.